Archive for November, 2009

Obama Administration launches STEM campaign

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

The Obama Administration launched an “Educate to Innovate” campaign this week that is focused on boosting the participation and achievement of students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

This campaign includes a partnership with the administration, leading companies, foundations, non-profits, and science and engineering societies. The administration plans to deploy a mix of strategies to highlight students’ success in STEM as a national priority. The attention to education stakeholder partnerships and STEM programs could lead to more opportunities for CTE, which already focuses on those areas.

The administration noted three broad goals:
• Increase STEM literacy so that all students can learn deeply and think critically in science, math, engineering, and technology.
• Move American students from the middle of the pack to top in the next decade.
• Expand STEM education and career opportunities for underrepresented groups, including women and girls.

Career Clusters at the ACTE Convention

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

 

CarClustSmallLast week I travelled to Nashville to make several presentations on Career Clusters and programs of study at the ACTE Annual Convention.  Being at this meeting just reinforced to me the strong interest that exists in Career Clusters throughout the CTE community.  In addition to presenting at a more informal roundtable discussion about Career Cluster products and services I made formal presentations at three other sessions. 

The first was what I call the “DEFs of Clusters” where people get the information they need to know about Career Clusters after they learn their Career Cluster ABCs.  The session provides some broad context about Career Clusters and programs of study but spends the bulk of its time helping participants understand the 15 critical components for implementation.

My second session, entitled “Demonstrating the Benefit of Career Clusters and High Quality CTE to our Communities” reinforces to people why it is important to get the message out to our communities about the important work Career Clusters is accomplishing, and working with them to support our vision.  The session helps participants understand the perspectives of educators, students, elected officials, and business and industry and provides examples about methods that are effective in sharing the goals and visions of Career Clusters and CTE with diverse communities.

I also had the pleasure of being on a panel with OVAE and the Institute for a Competitive Workforce on “The National Discussion on Career Pathways & Programs of Study”.    Here I was able to provide a broad overview of the work NASDCTE/NCTEF is doing to advance the goals and vision of the Career Clusters’ Initiative.

I was struck by the diversity of types of people who made an effort to come to these sessions.  There were secondary as well as postsecondary participants, as well as a range of administrators and classroom personnel.  A trend that seems to be growing throughout the year is the active role counselors are taking to learn about Career Clusters.  In fact, I would say at the roundtable discussions a full 75% of participants were counselors seeking Career Clusters guidance and information.

ACTE Conference: Career Clusters and Counseling

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

Last week I attended ACTE’s Annual Convention and Career Tech Expo in Nashville, TN.  While I was there, I presented a session entitled “Using Career Clusters as a Framework for Successful Counseling.”  I was happy to have a turnout of about 25 people, mostly school counselors.

I first addressed some of the challenges facing education today and suggested that career and guidance counseling could offer potential solutions to these problems.  Next I turned to the cluster model and talked about how counselors could use cluster interest inventories to help students identify their career interests and then use the pathways models and plans of study to help students figure out which classes to take to reach their goals.  Finally, I gave examples of work that schools in Colorado, Nebraska and New Jersey are doing to integrate the clusters framework into their career guidance efforts.  During my comments about Delsea Regional High School in New Jersey, I was pleasantly surprised when a woman in the back of the room raised her hand and said that she was from that high school and was working on implementing the very program I was talking about.  She took a few minutes and gave the audience more detailed information on how the school is aligning their curriculum and counseling to clusters.

You can download a copy of my slides here.

Green Definition: Apollo Alliance

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

The Apollo Alliance is a coalition of labor, business, environmental, and community leaders whose mission is to spur a clean energy revolution in order to create millions of high-quality, green-collar jobs.

Paul Angelides, chair of the Apollo Alliance, defines green-collar job in this way:  “It has to pay decent wages and benefits that can support a family.  It has to be part of a real career path, with upward mobility.  And it needs to reduce waste and pollution and benefit the environment.”

This definition includes many of the areas that Perkins focuses on.  Perkins IV requires states to prepare students for employment in high demand, high wage, and high skill careers that are in, or lead to careers in, emerging fields.  We can all agree that “green” is the new and emerging field of the moment;  and the Apollo Alliance’s requirement that these jobs pay decent wages and be family supporting may satisfy the high wage component of Perkins.

Their inclusion of a “career path” also fits in nicely with CTE’s efforts in career pathways and the career cluster framework.  It is important that individuals have clear direction as they acquire skills and knowledge, gain employment, and move up in the green industry, as in any industry.

‘Education versus Training’ or ‘Education and Training’?

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

Last month, NASDCTEc met with the Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration. As we prepared for this meeting, a question lingered in my mind that we have all heard posed many times – is CTE education or training?

At the heart of this question is an assumption that education and training are fundamentally different. But are they?

One answer that I have heard quite often is that the difference between education and training is that education is a first chance system and the workforce/training is a second chance system. Is this still true today? Recent economic challenges facing our nation and the demands of the modern workplace have made it clear that all workers must be learners throughout their entire working career.  Also, consider the volatility of the workforce even absent the current economic crisis. Researchers note that individuals are voluntarily changing careers between 7 – 15 times throughout their working life.  Is a workforce system that is considered “second chance” sufficient to meet the needs of this economy? Does education just stop once you get your first round of postsecondary degrees?

Is the mission of education versus training different? Aren’t both education and training about providing customers (students of any age) with the knowledge and skills necessary to be successful citizens who can contribute positively their communities through their work or volunteer efforts?

Are the differences that have defined education and training steeped in concerns of competitiveness among programs rather than having truly divergent and separate missions and purposes?

CTE has often stood in the middle of the debate of education versus training – one foot firmly in each camp. As our organization moves forward with thinking about the next steps for CTE, this question of ‘education versus training’ or ‘education and training’ will surely be central to our discussion. What do you think?

Quality Career and Job Focused Programs Could be Critical in Global Competitiveness

Friday, November 20th, 2009

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, a high-profile, international research and policy group, recently released a report stating that “good vocational training is an important part of a strong economy.”

The report, Learning for Jobs, offers a set of policy recommendations to help countries implement strategies that are responsive to the labor market and would boost economic growth. OECD’s endorsement of quality career and job training could heighten conversations being had over the United State’s minimal investment in CTE when compared to competing countries such as China and India.

“Potentially, VET plays a key role in determining competitiveness,” the report said.

OECD refers to the career-focused educational system as Vocational Education and Training (VET), but acknowledges the different terms used across nations, including the United State’s term of CTE. Many traits that characterize OECD’s concept of “good” VET are similar to that of the U.S.: industry partnerships, occupational mobility, programs based on labor market.

Among the report’s recommendations:
•Offer a mix of vocational education reflecting student preferences and employers’ needs.
Also, provide transferable skills to support occupational mobility. Beyond secondary level, share costs among government, employers and students based on benefits obtained.
•In vocational institutions, promote partnerships with industry, encourage part-time work, and promote flexible pathways of recruitment. In the workplace, provide appropriate pedagogical preparation to those responsible for trainees and apprentices. Nationally, adopt a standardized assessment framework.
•Offer sufficient incentives for both employers and students to participate in workplace training. Ensure that training is of good quality, with effective quality assurance and contractual frameworks for apprentices.

Happy Birthday Career Academies: 40 Years Old!

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

Earlier this month, the career academies movement celebrated its’ 40th birthday in Philadelphia, the birthplace of career academies.  The reasons for starting career academies 40 ago hold true today – making learning relevant, reducing the drop out rate, connecting students to the workplace, creating opportunities for students, engaging the local community in the school, increasing achievment, and improving earnings potential. Given the fickleness of reform initiatives, any reform effort lasting 40 years is a pretty outstanding accomplishment. Congratulations!

To acknowledge the momentus occasion, the National Career Academy Coalition commissioned a paper: High School Career Academies: A 40-Year Proven Model for Improving College and Career Readiness .  The paper was highlighted at a November 4 briefing where speakers Kelly Hastings from Senator Enzi’s office, Connie Scotchel-Gross from Palm Beach County, FL, and Andy Chavez from Marriott spoke about their perspectives and shared their experiences with career academies.  The panel reflected the important intersection of partners that career acdaemies bring together – education, government, community and business.  The publication is a great resource that provides an overview of career academies, as well as shares a series of policy recommendations.

What makes career academies unique?  In addition to outlasting many other reform efforts, career academies have a very strong research base and proof of impact.  MDRC did a random assignment study of career academies that found a positive impact on attendance, earned credits, and high school graduation and college attendance rates. Additionally, participation in a career academy increased post-high school employment rates and earnings, particularly for at-risk young men.

With a focus on quality, a coalition of organizations created the National Standards of Practice that guide the continuous improvement. Happy birthday career academies! Wishing you 40 more years of success! Thanks for helping so many students succeed!

The Summit on Future Directions for CTE: Getting to Where We Want To Go

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

future directions

The Summit on Future Directions for CTE: Getting to Where We Want To Go
4th and last in the series

A leader takes people where they want to go. A great leader takes people where they don’t necessarily want to go but ought to be. – Rosalyn Carter

 

report out #2In the last post on the Fall Summit I shared that states ended day two by voting on the 24 principles that were crafted during the small group work. I can’t emphasize how grateful I am to all the Summit attendees. Everyone took the charge of defining the Future Directions for CTE very seriously. Attendees brainstormed, crafted, drafted, worked and reworked words until they became statements and statements until they became principles. This is really hard work. And attendees gave it their all!

 

Here is a sampling of the principles. This will give you a sense of the tone and spirit of the principles that were crafted:

• CTE is an educational engine geared toward a high skills, high wage, high performance workforce for the global innovation economy.

• CTE is a collaboration between business/industry and education (K-12 through adult) that must be flexible and collaborative in its delivery of education.

• Education is deliberate, relevant and authentic for every student, and is accessible without limitations of time and place.

** Note: We have made the decision not to share the 24 principles on the blog. These 24 principles are really raw material that taken out of context might be misinterpreted. We do have a plan for gathering additional input and sharing the next steps in this process. See below.

Voting Results: Much like Election Day, we all were waiting anxiously for the results to come in. The goal of the “straw poll” was to determine how close to consensus we were. Were we a divided community? Did we need to go back to the drawing board? Did the principles go far enough? Did the principles go too far?

voting

Of the 24 principles, seven had the support of more than 90% of the voting states. The voting states comprised all but five states. One could say that consensus achieved among these top seven principles was a slam dunk. Wow! These top seven principles clearly represented the major themes/priorities that CTE must focus on during the next ten years.

rigorChoosing Our Words Carefully: With the principles now drafted, we chose to tackle a question that was raised by an attendee on day one – “when we say a term like ‘program of study’ do we all agree on the same definition of what this is and what it looks like to implement this well?” Attendees nodded their heads “yes, but of course we agree and understand these terms. We are all CTE leaders.” However, it became evident during the small group work that even among the selected group at the Summit, terms like programs of study, rigor, seamless and articulation have very different meanings, interpretations and implementation. Attendees spent some time on day three crafting common definitions for 14 terms but this work is far from complete. A charge for us in the future!

who am iSo Where Do We Go From Here?: Our Board of Directors met on November 9 to review the Summit work/outcomes and to approve a ‘go forward’ plan that includes a webinar for Summit attendees and a series of regional calls with the state directors in December, as well as a Board of Directors’ retreat in January where the Board will finalize the vision and principles. On February 17, 2010 at 2 pm eastern we will host a webinar to unveil the new vision and corresponding principles. And at the NASDCTEc spring meeting in Washington, D.C. we will once again roll up our sleeves and work together to craft the action steps to achieve our new vision.

guidepostLooking Ahead: Our organization’s efforts to define a new vision for CTE is not about dismantling what we have in place or discrediting the success we have achieved so far. Instead, it is about looking back on what we have achieved and learning from both our successes and failures. It is about ensuring that the opportunities before CTE are maximized. It is about staying relevant in an ever-changing educational and economic environment. We can’t be what we always have been. In 2009, we don’t look like what we did in 1999; and we shouldn’t look today like we will look like in 2019. We can build on what we have accomplished. With a new vision guiding our work and the right leadership in place, we can get to where we ought to be!

Adult Career Pathways Advocacy Tool

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

As the nation grapples with the economic recession, more and more adults are enrolling in some form of education or training class to upgrade or diversify their skills.  Adult career pathways offer a flexible way for adults to gain technical, academic and ESL skills that lead to a degree or credential.

Check out our latest leave behind about adult career pathways that we will use to inform legislators and their staff on the Hill about the link between CTE and adult education.  You can access a copy of it here.  This leave behind explains what an adult career pathway is, the benefits of an adult career pathway, and gives a sampling of adult career pathway programs in the states.

Please feel free to use this document to inform policymakers and legislators in your state about the benefits of CTE!

Weak Education Pipeline Could Stunt Community College Potential and Students’ Economic Mobility

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

Community colleges can boost earnings for students, particularly those who pursue high-return fields such as computer science or engineering; however the greatest impediments to such success are failings among high schools to prepare students for postsecondary education, according to a recent study.

Findings in Strengthening Community Colleges’ Influence on Economic Mobility, a The Pew Charitable Trusts report, underscore the need to fortify connections between secondary and postsecondary institutions. Given the new national focus on community colleges, the projected growth in technical fields and the rising demand for college and career readiness, CTE appears poised to play an integral role in addressing the pipeline issue.

Positive outcomes such as student achievement in community colleges and the obtainment of higher wages after community college are more likely among students who earn higher GPAs in high school, said the report, which focused on Florida community colleges.

“The largest factor limiting the ability of community colleges to raise the earnings of their students through the transfer function is students’ poor academic preparation in high school and the difficulty of quickly boosting their performance through developmental programs,” the report said.

Lack of postsecondary readiness could have an ultimate impact on a students’ overall economic mobility. According to the report, students with higher high school GPAs complete more postsecondary courses that have higher financial returns. For instance, earnings significantly increase among students who concentrate in high-return fields such as health care, agriculture, business and computer science, which are largely CTE-focused areas.

Seven years after leaving college, Florida students’ average annual earning in high-return fields averaged about $54,000. That compares to the $42,000 average annual earnings among students in low-return fields such as communications, humanities and consumer services, the report said.

Students, particularly the notable amount of low-income individuals who earn degrees in community colleges, may by shortchanged of opportunities because of stubborn institutional silos and inadequacies of certain high school programs. This report underscores the strengths of community colleges as well as what needs to be done at all educational levels to maximize the potential for all students and the nation’s economy.