Posts Tagged ‘accountability’

Race to the Top Assessment Winners Announced

Thursday, September 2nd, 2010

Today, the Department of Education announced more than $330 million in Race to the Top assessment grant awards to the consortia of states that submitted applications. The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) will receive $170 million and the SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) will receive $160 million. The goal of these two consortia is to develop a “new generation” of math and English language arts assessments for third grade through high school that will be aligned to the Common Core State Standards. The assessments will be put into place by the 2014-2015 school year.

PARCC is a coalition of 26 states and will test students’ ability to read complex text, complete research projects, excel at classroom speaking and listening assignments, and work with digital media. The consortia will replace the single year-end high stakes test with a series of assessments given throughout the year. PARCC’s application stated that its assessment system “will provide the tools needed to identify whether students—from grade 3 through high school—are on a trajectory for postsecondary success and, critically, where gaps may exist and how they can be remediated well before students enter college or the workforce.”

SBAC is comprised of 31 states that will test students using computer adaptive technology that will ask students tailored questions based on their previous answers. The consortia will still use a single test at the end of the year for accountability purposes, but will create a series of interim tests throughout the year to let students, parents, and teachers know whether students are on track. You can see which states are included in both of the consortia here.

In a speech this morning at Achieve, Inc. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said that states in both consortia have agreed to set the same achievement levels or cut‐scores on their  assessments and that the Department will ask them to collaborate to make sure student test results are comparable across participating states. Duncan also laid out how these assessments differ from existing state tests, including the use of smart technology, immediate feedback, accommodations, and the use of formative assessments that document student growth. Finally he said that “for the first time, the new assessments will better measure the higher‐order thinking skills so vital to success in the global economy of the 21st century and the future of American prosperity. To be on track today for college and careers, students need to show that they can analyze and solve complex problems, communicate clearly, synthesize information, apply knowledge, and generalize learning to other settings.”

As you may be aware, there was a third group of states, the State Consortium on Board Examination Systems, that applied for $30 million in funding under the competition to support assessments at the high school level. However, this group did not win an award.

DQC Webinar on Data Sharing Between SEAs and Teacher Preparation Programs

Monday, August 16th, 2010

The Data Quality Campaign (DQC), along with groups such as the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, the Council of Chief State School Officers, and the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, have created a template to guide discussions by states and teacher preparation programs around how data can be collected, analyzed, shared and used to improve the preparation of teachers and the ultimate increase in stDQC logoudent achievement. On August 24th at 1 p.m. ET the Data Quality Campaign will host a webinar, “Leveraging State Longitudinal Data Systems To Inform Teacher Preparation and Continuous Improvement,” where they will introduce the template and hear from states that have begun developing data partnerships with teacher preparation programs. You may register for the webinar here.

West Virginia Governor Takes Over as Chair of NGA, Unveils College Completion Initiative

Tuesday, July 13th, 2010

At their 102nd annual meeting in Boston this weekend, West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin III becamGovManchine chair of the National Governors Association (NGA). Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman was named NGA Vice Chair. During the meeting Gov. Manchin announced his new initiative, Complete to Compete, which focuses on increasing the number of students in the United States who complete college degrees and certificates and improving the productivity of the country’s higher education institutions.

“My initiative will bring together governors, higher education executive officers, campus leaders and corporate CEOs to make marked improvements in college completion and productivity and get our country back on track to produce a successful workforce for the future,” said Gov. Manchin.

CompletCompetetoCompletee to Compete will create a set of common higher education completion and productivity measures that governors and higher education leaders can use to monitor state progress and to compare their performance to other states and between institutions. These proposed measures can be found in Complete to Compete: Common College Completion Metrics. This report will be followed in the coming weeks by a technical guide for states.

The Complete to Compete initiative will also:

  • Develop a series of best practices and a list of policy actions governors can take to achieve increased college completion;
  • Provide support to states to design policies and programs that increase college completion and improve higher education productivity and serve as models for other states around the country; and
  • Hold a learning institute for governors’ senior advisors in education, workforce and economic development focusing on successful state strategies to graduate more students and meet workforce demands.

Secretary Duncan Appoints Committee on Measures of Student Success

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

On Wednesday, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan announced the 15 members of the new Committee on Measures of Student Success which will advise the Secretary in assisting two-year degree-granting institutions of higher education in meeting the completion or graduation rate disclosure requirements outlined in section 485 of the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008. The committee will also develop recommendations regarding additional or alternate measures of student success that are comparable alternatives to the completion or graduation rates, taking into account the mission and role of two-year degree-granting higher education institutions. These recommendations will be submitted to the Secretary within 18 months of the first meeting of the Committee.

The panel will be chaired by Thomas Bailey, professor of economics and education at Columbia University’s Teachers College and head of the Community College Research Center. The other members are:

  • Margarita Benitez, senior associate, Excelencia in Education
  • Wayne Burton, president, North Shore Community College
  • Kevin Carey, policy director, Education Sector
  • Alisa Federico Cunningham, vice president, Institute for Higher Education Policy
  • Jacob Fraire, assistant vice president for educational alliances, Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation
  • Isabel Friedman, student, University of Pennsylvania
  • Millie Garcia, president, California State University at Dominguez Hills
  • Sharon Kristovich, higher education consultant
  • Harold Levy, managing director, Palm Ventures; former chancellor of New York City Public Schools
  • Geri Palast, executive director, Campaign for Fiscal Equity
  • Patrick Perry, vice chancellor, California Community College System
  • Lashawn Richburg-Hayes, deputy director, MDRC
  • Linda Thor, chancellor, De Anza College
  • Belle Wheelan, president, Southern Association of Colleges and Schools’ Commission on Colleges

Data Quality Institute Posts Preliminary Outline, Shares Topics Being Considered

Friday, May 7th, 2010

According to the Perkins Collaborative Resource Network (PCRN), the 2010 Data Quality Institute (DQI) will be ‘virtual,’ spreading out over a several week time period in late 2010, rather than concentrated into a single block of 1 1/2 to 2 days. Content will be offered via general strands, with sessions currently in consideration that include:

  • Perkins Accountability 101 for new state staff
  • Common Reporting Mistakes in CAR report data entry
  • POS Evaluation Workshop
  • Performance–based funding in CTE
  • And many more topics

Refer to the PCRN Web site for more information.

PCRN is a resource of the Division of Academic and Technical Education (DATE),  within the Office of Vocational and Adult Education (OVAE).

Obama Administration Releases ESEA Blueprint

Monday, March 15th, 2010

This weekend, the Obama Administration released its blueprint for revising the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) with the goal of raising expectations of students and rewarding schools for producing dramatic gains in student achievement. The blueprint builds on the reforms currently being undertaken through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, including:

  • College- and Career-Ready Standards and Assessments
  • Great Teachers and Leaders in Every School
  • Equity and Opportunity for All Students
  • Raise the Bar and Reward Excellence
  • Promote Innovation and Continuous Improvement

Many of these priorities align to the areas of focus in NASDCTEc’s ESEA reauthorization recommendations.

Of particular note in the blueprint is the administration’s plan for funding for assessments in the law, which CTE could be a part of [emphasis added]:

“States will receive formula grants to develop and implement high-quality assessments aligned with college- and career-ready standards in English language arts and mathemat­ics that accurately measure student academic achievement and growth, provide feedback to support and improve teaching, and measure school success and progress. States may also use funds to develop or implement high-quality, rigorous statewide assessments in other academic or career and technical subjects, high school course assessments, English language proficiency assessments, and interim or formative assessments. Beginning in 2015, formula funds will be available only to states that are implementing assessments based on college- and career-ready standards that are common to a significant number of states. The program also will support competitive grants to consortia of states, and to other entities working in partnership with states, for research on, or development and improvement of, additional high-quality assessments to be used by multiple states in such areas as science, history, or foreign languages; high school course assessments in academ­ic and career and technical subjects; universally designed assessments; and assessments for English Learners and students with disabilities.”

CTE may also benefit from the proposed grant program to increase access to accelerated learning opportunities  that help students prepare for, or directly provide, college-level work such as dual enrollment and early-college programs.

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan will testify before both the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee and the House Education and Labor Committee on Wednesday to discuss the blueprint.

CLASP Recommendations for WIA Reauthorization Promote Shared Accountability System

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

In a new set of Workforce Investment Act (WIA) recommendations, CLASP advocates for significant changes to performance accountability for workforce development and adult education programs authorized under WIA.  The recommendations included:

  • Title I of WIA should focus on high quality education, training and related services that provide individuals with the necessary skills and experience to access jobs that pay family-supporting wages and have advancement potential.
  • Title II of WIA, also known as the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act, should focus on increasing the rate at which all adult education students attain career and postsecondary success.
  • Title I and II should be better aligned within a career pathways framework in order to provide more intensive and integrated workforce development and adult education services that are linked to income, work and academic supports and to better connect these systems with employers and postsecondary education.

Regarding their recommendation for better alignment, CLASP would also like to see a shared accountability system across WIA and other workforce development and education programs like the Carl D. Perkins Act, postsecondary education, Trade Adjustment Assistance, and the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). This shared system of accountability would include a shared set of interim and outcome measures, consistent definitions of units of service that can be used across federal programs, commonly agreed upon cost-allocation methods for services funded by multiple sources, and consistent standards of data quality and data sharing.

Community Colleges’ Assets Hidden, Report Says

Friday, March 5th, 2010

Community colleges have long served the nation and its workforce by playing a significant role in providing the necessary education and training for individuals. And in light of the nation’s economic turn of events, community colleges are experiencing even more growth and facing greater demand to serve as an educational and training hub.

But with this great opportunity, community colleges are also facing different and higher expectations. An obstacle to their growth may be their inability to demonstrate accountability – comparable evidence that community colleges are meeting the desired goals.  A recent report, Counting the Hidden Assets: First Steps in Assessing the Impact of Community College Noncredit Education Programs on the Workforce and Local Economies, by the Community College Resource Center explores the issue.

The report notes that “there is no standard national measurement of the direct educational and economic benefits of noncredit courses to their communities, so they are not systematically evaluated.” That means despite the demand for community colleges by individuals and the growing requirement by employers for workers with postsecondary education, policymakers and other funders may lack the valid information to understand the need to support community colleges, the report said.

The report provides recommendations on how to measure success of community colleges as a first step to address the very large issue of data collection and measurement, and relating the information to accountability and standards.

College and Career Readiness Goals Not Reflected in Most High School Accountability Systems

Friday, February 5th, 2010

In College-and-Career Ready: Using Outcomes Data to Hold High Schools Accountable for Student Success, the Education Sector reports that many districts rate schools solely on graduation rates and on student scores on basic-skills tests in a single year, but finds that most high school accountability systems fail to recognize college and career ready goals. The report suggests that states can do more to recognize college and career readiness goals by calculating the earnings of graduates who enter the workforce, broken down by occupation and industry sector.

Getting Assessment Right in ESEA Reauthorization

Friday, January 8th, 2010

Yesterday, the Forum on Education Accountability (FEA) hosted a discussion with Linda Darling-Hammond of Stanford University, Gene Wilhoit from the Council of Chief State School Officers, and Monty Neil of FEA.

The panelists discussed issues regarding assessments in the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, including performance assessment, use of local and classroom evidence of learning, formative and summative assessment, possibilities of new technology, and the role of common core standards and assessments.

Linda Darling-Hammond gave an international  perspective on other countries assessment methods.  While the U.S. tends to test students on recall and rote learning, other countries are more concerned with hands-on experience and application of knowledge.  In Singapore, students are evaluated through project-based assessments where they are asked to identify a problem, design an investigation, evaluate their methods and use various scientific technologies and apparatus.

During the question and answer period, the panelists stressed that while performance-based assessments are more expensive than the current tests administered in the U.S., they are worth the investment for several reasons.  First, they are cheaper than intervention or remediation later.  Second, students learn more through application, and teachers learn more by designing such tests.  Finally, performance-based assessments will yield higher quality results than multiple choice tests alone.